Terry, who manages his 90-year-old father’s rental properties in Hobart’s northern suburbs, expresses deep concern over proposed legislative changes that would allow tenants to keep pets without prior landlord approval. Built by his father over 40 years ago, these units serve as his primary income, crucial since he does not receive a pension.
“For my father, this isn’t about being a wealthy landlord; it’s about survival,” Terry emphasized, opting not to disclose his last name. “A lot of effort went into these investments to secure a future.”
However, recent challenges—including costly pet-related damage and rising operational expenses—have Terry reconsidering the viability of maintaining the properties. He recounted instances where damage caused by pets significantly impacted his father’s income, citing thousands of dollars spent on carpet and curtain replacements.
In June, the Tasmanian government introduced legislation allowing tenants to keep pets upon notification to landlords, bypassing the need for permission. Advocates, like the Tenants Union of Tasmania, applaud these reforms for balancing tenant rights with landlord interests.
Conversely, the Real Estate Institute of Tasmania (REIT) launched the ‘Hear Our Voice’ campaign, arguing that the legislation could lead to landlords selling properties or increasing rents due to increased risks and costs associated with pet ownership in rentals. REIT CEO Michelle Tynan highlighted concerns over the absence of provisions like pet bonds and mandatory cleaning requirements.
Terry voiced skepticism about the future viability of rental ownership under these conditions, suggesting that selling the properties might be more prudent than continuing under heightened risks.
Minister Eric Abetz reaffirmed the government’s commitment to the proposed reforms but indicated openness to stakeholder feedback.
The REIT has sought a meeting with Premier Jeremy Rockliff to address its concerns, citing dissatisfaction with the legislative process and its perceived lack of industry consultation.
As Tasmania navigates these proposed changes, stakeholders on both sides continue to advocate for their respective positions, underscoring the complex balance between tenant rights and landlord protections in rental property legislation.
Related Topics:
